🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.