🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in other EU countries